Analysis cases
New analysis case
CO

Testing

Test 2 BN9 9YB

test

Source maps Map pages Analysis runs Detection review Registration & distances Land uses Review table Chronology Evidence ledger
Measured candidates169
Consolidated groups144
Unresolved in radius66
Reviewed groups0
Outside radius77
Duplicates removed25
Ambiguous groups3
Feature extent checks6
Auto-suppressed noise1

Consolidated consultant review

OCR variants are grouped using page-local evidence, companion-page matching and site-centred spatial clustering. Broad mapped areas and ambiguous compound labels remain explicit consultant checks.

Prepare chronology drafts
Reset
0 groups selected
Bleach Works Pending Potential contaminative use Feature extent check
1849–1850 · 1:10,560 · Industrial · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 17 · OCR variants: Bleach Works / each Worlks ch Wolks
Measured relationship 92 m south-west Interpretation confidence 55% OCR evidence 82%
This is a broad mapped feature. The measured value locates its printed label, so confirm the actual feature extent and site relationship.
Review 1 source candidate
Bleach Works Page 17 · 1849–1850 · 1:10,560 · 92 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1894 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 2 · OCR variants: Reseropir / Reservoir
Measured relationship 45 m north Interpretation confidence 87% OCR evidence 94%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 2 · 1894 · 1:2,500 · 45 m north
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1894 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 2
Measured relationship 59 m west Interpretation confidence 76% OCR evidence 82%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 2 · 1894 · 1:2,500 · 59 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1894 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 2
Measured relationship 106 m north-west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 2 · 1894 · 1:2,500 · 106 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Aqueduct / Chimney Pending Potential contaminative use Ambiguous OCR group
1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · Industrial · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 3 · OCR variants: Chimncy Aqueduct / Chimney
Measured relationship 14 m south-east Interpretation confidence 49% OCR evidence 98%
The OCR group contains more than one plausible feature. Choose the correct consultant wording before approval.
Review 1 source candidate
Chimney Page 3 · 1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · 14 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Chimney Pending Potential contaminative use
1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · Industrial · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 3
Measured relationship 245 m east Interpretation confidence 85% OCR evidence 92%
Review 1 source candidate
Chimney Page 3 · 1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · 245 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Holy Well Pending Environmental context
1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 3
Measured relationship 5 m south-west Interpretation confidence 81% OCR evidence 89%
Review 1 source candidate
Holy Well Page 3 · 1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · 5 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 3 · OCR variants: Resercoirs / Reservoir
Measured relationship 89 m north-west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 97%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 3 · 1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · 89 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 3
Measured relationship 139 m south-west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 98%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 3 · 1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · 139 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 3 · OCR variants: Reseropir / Reservoir
Measured relationship 214 m south-east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 99%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 3 · 1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · 214 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Spring Pending Environmental context
1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 3
Measured relationship 11 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Spring Page 3 · 1908–1909 · 1:2,500 · 11 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Holy Well Pending Environmental context
1909–1911 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 19 · OCR variants: GölyWell Göly]Well / Holy Well
Measured relationship 79 m west Interpretation confidence 78% OCR evidence 85%
Review 1 source candidate
Holy Well Page 19 · 1909–1911 · 1:10,560 · 79 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1909–1911 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 19 · OCR variants: Reservoir / servoirs
Measured relationship 163 m west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 96%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 19 · 1909–1911 · 1:10,560 · 163 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1909–1911 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 19 · OCR variants: Reservoi / Reservoir
Measured relationship 215 m south Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 19 · 1909–1911 · 1:10,560 · 215 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Aqueduct Pending Environmental context
1929 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 4 · OCR variants: Aqueduct / Aqueducy Aqueduct
Measured relationship 37 m east Interpretation confidence 87% OCR evidence 94%
Review 1 source candidate
Aqueduct Page 4 · 1929 · 1:2,500 · 37 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1929 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 4
Measured relationship 71 m north Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 4 · 1929 · 1:2,500 · 71 m north
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1929 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 4 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Resr.
Measured relationship 79 m south Interpretation confidence 86% OCR evidence 94%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 4 · 1929 · 1:2,500 · 79 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1929 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 4 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Reservoirs
Measured relationship 88 m north-west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 4 · 1929 · 1:2,500 · 88 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1929 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 4 · OCR variants: Reseruoir / Reservoir
Measured relationship 213 m south-east Interpretation confidence 86% OCR evidence 94%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 4 · 1929 · 1:2,500 · 213 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Spring Pending Environmental context
1929 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 4
Measured relationship 9 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Spring Page 4 · 1929 · 1:2,500 · 9 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Tank Pending Potential contaminative use
1929 · 1:2,500 · Fuel and storage · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 4
Measured relationship 51 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Tank Page 4 · 1929 · 1:2,500 · 51 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1930 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 21 · OCR variants: Reservoir / rvoirs
Measured relationship 159 m west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 98%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 21 · 1930 · 1:10,560 · 159 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1930 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 21
Measured relationship 213 m south Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 99%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 21 · 1930 · 1:10,560 · 213 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Well Pending Environmental context
1930 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 21
Measured relationship 85 m west Interpretation confidence 82% OCR evidence 89%
Review 1 source candidate
Well Page 21 · 1930 · 1:10,560 · 85 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1930–1931 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 20 · OCR variants: Reservoir / rvoirs
Measured relationship 159 m west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 98%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 20 · 1930–1931 · 1:10,560 · 159 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1930–1931 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 20 · OCR variants: Reservoi / Reservoir
Measured relationship 214 m south Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 97%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 20 · 1930–1931 · 1:10,560 · 214 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1938 · 1:10,560 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 22 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Resr.
Measured relationship 103 m north-west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 22 · 1938 · 1:10,560 · 103 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Capitol Works Pending Potential contaminative use Feature extent check
1954 · 1:1,250 · Industrial · 2 candidates · 2 evidence items Pages 6, 7
Measured relationship 77 m south · matching evidence Interpretation confidence 69% OCR evidence 100%
This is a broad mapped feature. The measured value locates its printed label, so confirm the actual feature extent and site relationship.
Review 2 source candidates
Capitol Works Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 77 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Capitol Works Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 77 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Holy Well Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 6 · OCR variants: Holy Holy Well / Holy Well
Measured relationship 5 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 97%
Review 1 source candidate
Holy Well Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 5 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Holy Well Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 2 candidates · 2 evidence items Pages 6, 7 · OCR variants: aly Well / Holy Well / Holy Well joly Well
Measured relationship 12 m west · matching evidence Interpretation confidence 93% OCR evidence 90%
Review 2 source candidates
Holy Well Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 12 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Holy Well Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 12 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Holy Well Spring / Holy Well Pending Environmental context Ambiguous OCR group
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 7 · OCR variants: Holy K'el Spring Holy K’elf / Holy Well Spring
Measured relationship 5 m east Interpretation confidence 42% OCR evidence 83%
The OCR group contains more than one plausible feature. Choose the correct consultant wording before approval.
Review 1 source candidate
Holy Well Spring Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 5 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 2 candidates · 2 evidence items Pages 6, 7 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Reservotr
Measured relationship 33 m west · matching evidence Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 100%
Review 2 source candidates
Reservoir Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 33 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 33 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 2 candidates · 2 evidence items Pages 6, 7
Measured relationship 36 m north · matching evidence Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 98%
Review 2 source candidates
Reservoir Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 36 m north
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 36 m north
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 5 candidates · 6 evidence items Pages 6, 7 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Reservoit / Reservolr / …
Measured relationship 42 m south · 50 m south-west · 69 m south-west Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 97%
Review 5 source candidates
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 42 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 42 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 50 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 50 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 69 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 6 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Reservvir
Measured relationship 53 m east Interpretation confidence 81% OCR evidence 89%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 53 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 2 candidates · 2 evidence items Pages 6, 7
Measured relationship 54 m north-west · matching evidence Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 100%
Review 2 source candidates
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 54 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 54 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 2 candidates · 2 evidence items Pages 6
Measured relationship 95 m east · 104 m east Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 100%
Review 2 source candidates
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 95 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 104 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 6 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Reservoi Reservol
Measured relationship 109 m south-east Interpretation confidence 87% OCR evidence 94%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 109 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Spring Pending Environmental context
1954 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 6
Measured relationship 6 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Spring Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 6 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Warehouse Pending Potential contaminative use Feature extent check
1954 · 1:1,250 · Industrial · 7 candidates · 7 evidence items Pages 6, 7 · OCR variants: Warehoine Warehoune / Warehous / Warehouse / …
Measured relationship 6 m north · 16 m east · 30 m east · +4 more Interpretation confidence 69% OCR evidence 94%
This is a broad mapped feature. The measured value locates its printed label, so confirm the actual feature extent and site relationship.
Review 7 source candidates
Warehouse Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 6 m north
Pending Open map evidence
Warehouse Page 7 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 16 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Warehouse Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 30 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Warehouse Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 54 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Warehouse Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 86 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Warehouse Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 146 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Warehouse Page 6 · 1954 · 1:1,250 · 152 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Capitol Works Pending Potential contaminative use Feature extent check
1955 · 1:2,500 · Industrial · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 8
Measured relationship 152 m south Interpretation confidence 64% OCR evidence 100%
This is a broad mapped feature. The measured value locates its printed label, so confirm the actual feature extent and site relationship.
Review 1 source candidate
Capitol Works Page 8 · 1955 · 1:2,500 · 152 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1955 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 8
Measured relationship 65 m west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 8 · 1955 · 1:2,500 · 65 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1955 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 8
Measured relationship 108 m east Interpretation confidence 74% OCR evidence 81%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 8 · 1955 · 1:2,500 · 108 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1955 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 8
Measured relationship 108 m north-west Interpretation confidence 86% OCR evidence 93%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 8 · 1955 · 1:2,500 · 108 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1955 · 1:2,500 · Utilities and water · 2 candidates · 2 evidence items Pages 8 · OCR variants: "Reser voir / Reservoir
Measured relationship 192 m east · 207 m east Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 95%
Review 2 source candidates
Reservoir Page 8 · 1955 · 1:2,500 · 192 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 8 · 1955 · 1:2,500 · 207 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1974 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 9 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Reservol
Measured relationship 95 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 96%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 9 · 1974 · 1:1,250 · 95 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Prospect Foundry Pending Potential contaminative use Feature extent check
1976 · 1:1,250 · Industrial · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 10
Measured relationship 79 m east Interpretation confidence 64% OCR evidence 99%
This is a broad mapped feature. The measured value locates its printed label, so confirm the actual feature extent and site relationship.
Review 1 source candidate
Prospect Foundry Page 10 · 1976 · 1:1,250 · 79 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1976 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 10
Measured relationship 95 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 10 · 1976 · 1:1,250 · 95 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1976 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 10 · OCR variants: Reservo / Reservoir
Measured relationship 108 m south-east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 10 · 1976 · 1:1,250 · 108 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1976 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 10 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Reservolr
Measured relationship 125 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 99%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 10 · 1976 · 1:1,250 · 125 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1987 · 1:10,000 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 28 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Resr
Measured relationship 37 m south Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 28 · 1987 · 1:10,000 · 37 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1987 · 1:10,000 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 28 · OCR variants: Reservoir / Resrs
Measured relationship 112 m south-west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 97%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 28 · 1987 · 1:10,000 · 112 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Capitol Works Pending Potential contaminative use Feature extent check
1992 · 1:1,250 · Industrial · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 12
Measured relationship 70 m south Interpretation confidence 64% OCR evidence 97%
This is a broad mapped feature. The measured value locates its printed label, so confirm the actual feature extent and site relationship.
Review 1 source candidate
Capitol Works Page 12 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 70 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Holy Well Spring / Holy Well Pending Environmental context Ambiguous OCR group
1992 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 11 · OCR variants: Holy Well Spring / Spring Holy WeH
Measured relationship 5 m east Interpretation confidence 41% OCR evidence 81%
The OCR group contains more than one plausible feature. Choose the correct consultant wording before approval.
Review 1 source candidate
Holy Well Spring Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 5 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1992 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 4 candidates · 4 evidence items Pages 11, 12 · OCR variants: Regervoir rvolr / Reservoir / Reservoir ervair
Measured relationship 32 m north-west · 54 m north-west · 61 m north-west Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 94%
Review 4 source candidates
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 32 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 12 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 32 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 54 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 61 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1992 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 5 candidates · 5 evidence items Pages 11, 12 · OCR variants: Raservoir / Reservoir / Reser voir
Measured relationship 41 m south · 42 m south · 43 m south-east · +2 more Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 96%
Review 5 source candidates
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 41 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 12 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 42 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 43 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 50 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 72 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1992 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 11 · OCR variants: Reserroir / Reservoir
Measured relationship 50 m north Interpretation confidence 78% OCR evidence 85%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 50 m north
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1992 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 11
Measured relationship 95 m east Interpretation confidence 78% OCR evidence 85%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 95 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1992 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 2 candidates · 2 evidence items Pages 11, 12 · OCR variants: Resarvoir / Reservoir
Measured relationship 110 m south-east · matching evidence Interpretation confidence 96% OCR evidence 95%
Review 2 source candidates
Reservoir Page 12 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 110 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 110 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1992 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 11 · OCR variants: Reserveir / Reservoir
Measured relationship 125 m east Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 97%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 125 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Spring Pending Environmental context
1992 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 12
Measured relationship 6 m east Interpretation confidence 82% OCR evidence 90%
Review 1 source candidate
Spring Page 12 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 6 m east
Pending Open map evidence
Tip Pending Potential contaminative use
1992 · 1:1,250 · Waste and landfill · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 11
Measured relationship 36 m south-west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Tip Page 11 · 1992 · 1:1,250 · 36 m south-west
Pending Open map evidence
Holy Well Pending Environmental context
1994–1995 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 13 · OCR variants: Holy Well / Holy Well Holy Wqll (e't of
Measured relationship 15 m west Interpretation confidence 76% OCR evidence 82%
Review 1 source candidate
Holy Well Page 13 · 1994–1995 · 1:1,250 · 15 m west
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1994–1995 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 13 · OCR variants: Reservair / Reservoir
Measured relationship 41 m south Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 98%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 13 · 1994–1995 · 1:1,250 · 41 m south
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1994–1995 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 13 · OCR variants: Remervoir / Reservoir
Measured relationship 43 m south-east Interpretation confidence 72% OCR evidence 78%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 13 · 1994–1995 · 1:1,250 · 43 m south-east
Pending Open map evidence
Reservoir Pending Environmental context
1994–1995 · 1:1,250 · Utilities and water · 1 candidate · 1 evidence item Pages 13
Measured relationship 54 m north-west Interpretation confidence 88% OCR evidence 100%
Review 1 source candidate
Reservoir Page 13 · 1994–1995 · 1:1,250 · 54 m north-west
Pending Open map evidence